Does a report with a lookback of 1 year take longer to run than a report with a lookback of 3 months?

When a report has a lookback period of one year compared to one of three months, it generally requires processing a larger volume of data. Since a one-year lookback encompasses a greater timeframe, the system must retrieve and analyze significantly more records, which can inherently consume more time during execution. This increased data volume directly translates to longer processing times, as the system must perform additional calculations and sorting on a larger dataset.

In contrast, the report with a lookback of three months deals with a smaller amount of data. Therefore, it is processed more quickly because the system is not sifting through as many records, making the execution time shorter. The difference in execution times between the two reports illustrates how the amount of data being processed directly influences report performance.

This reasoning reinforces the idea that the duration to run reports can vary significantly based on the defined lookback period, making the assertion true.